Windows LiveWindows Live™
 
 
YANG's profile天沙坠心井（忆什）PhotosBlogListsMore Tools Help

Blog
    July 11

    航空公司的安全性排名

    一份06年的排名，可参见：
     
    最安全的是德国汉莎航空（第1，92.2分）
    中国排名最高的是香港国泰（第11，89.5分）
    国航不知道怎么那么低（第151，65.3分）
     
    不过我想这都是很老的数据了，国航现在不至于那么低。
    但是，汉莎和国泰应该确实都是很不错的。
     
    4:27 PM | Blog it

    Comments (6)

    Please wait...
    Sorry, the comment you entered is too long. Please shorten it.
    You didn't enter anything. Please try again.
    Sorry, we can't add your comment right now. Please try again later.
    To add a comment, you need permission from your parent. Ask for permission
    Your parent has turned off comments.
    Sorry, we can't delete your comment right now. Please try again later.
    You've exceeded the maximum number of comments that can be left in one day. Please try again in 24 hours.
    Your account has had the ability to leave comments disabled because our systems indicate that you may be spamming other users. If you believe that your account has been disabled in error please contact Windows Live support.
    Complete the security check below to finish leaving your comment.
    The characters you type in the security check must match the characters in the picture or audio.

    To add a comment, sign in with your Windows Live ID (if you use Hotmail, Messenger, or Xbox LIVE, you have a Windows Live ID). Sign in


    Don't have a Windows Live ID? Sign up
    宽 米wrote:
    评估的前半截参数还有点借鉴性 机龄和机型 以及一些质量体系标准
    后面关于合作模式和经营比例拿到中国就不具有参考性了

    我觉得还不如添加个机械师的薪资水平 机长副机长的平均飞行里程

    飞机安全不安全也就是看飞机设计 飞机保养 飞机使用 其他的东西想像不出有太多相关性
    July 12
    absolue 抒wrote:
    好像排名那几年正好出事了吧
    July 12
    zan xuwrote:
    瑞安能和这么多国家航空齐名，看来确实还不错，我以前小看他了。。
    不过汉莎强悍，以后强烈支持。。
    July 12
    Clarence Xuwrote:
    ryanair排名31，看来还挺不错的
    July 11
    kai ningwrote:
    而且汉莎服务很好的
    July 11
    蕴龙wrote:
    第一反应是这个是根据掉下飞机的数量统计出来的吗，呵呵，原来链接里有详细算法
    July 11

    Trackbacks

    The trackback URL for this entry is:
    http://memorywhat.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!940EBC52A3B8B78B!2025.trak
    Weblogs that reference this entry
    • None